![]() |
In the case of the Crimson Avenger, however, we see a pretty dramatic style change in
![]() |
the more or less original look |
![]() |
the new look as of Detective Comics |
While it's certainly possible that this was the rationale motivating the editorial decision, it doesn't make much sense to me.
First, marking a line between "costumed vigilantes" and "superheroes" strikes me as a distinction without a difference. (Unless one were to define the difference as being violent vs. non-violent, or super-powered vs. non-super-powered individuals.)
Second, it seems to me there were a great many "costumed vigilantes" who remained as popular as the Crimson Avenger, without surrendering the business-attire-influenced look. For example:
![]() |
Sandman Adventure Comics #60 MAR 1941 (though Sandman had his own costume change by May of the next year) |
![]() |
Universal Studios poster 1941 |
![]() | |
Midnight Smash Comics #54 AUG 1944 |
![]() |
The Spirit The Spirit #22 AUG 1950 |
So, essentially, I'm curious if anyone has ever heard an alternative explanation for the costume change; or at least a fuller fleshing out of the standard explanation to account for why it was felt Crimson Avenger had to change, when these other guys clearly didn't.