Pages

Webcomic Review Format & Rubric (Part 2): Sustainability

In the first post of these series, I shared why I started reviewing webcomics, as well as the eight qualities I consider in each review.  The first post concluded with brief comments on the Synopsis section of each review.

Today we'll look more in depth at the first assessment vector:  Sustainability.  This term signifies the likelihood that a comic will keep going. I believe this to be an especially important quality in the world of webcomics where it’s relatively easy to start up. The plus side to this is that we get a lot of new comics started all the time!  The downside is that the less-invested many people are in starting something, the less-invested they are in keeping it up.  (Commitment isn't exactly our "thing" in 2018.)  The Internet is littered with half-finished comics, and it’s frustrating to invest in a story, only to discover that it’s come to an abrupt halt and will (likely) never be completed.

I calculate this score by considering the history of the comic at the time I review it. Have the creators already established a track record of consistently putting out new content?

There's basically three factors that go in to determining the Sustainability rating.

  • How long has the comic been in production? 
    • Less than a year = 1
    • 1-2 years = 2
    • 2-3 years = 3
    • 3-4 years =4
    • 4+ years = 5
  • Is it currently ongoing?
    • no = 0
    • yes = 5
  • Have the creators posted on a reliable schedule? 
    • no = 0
    • yes = 5

To calculate the Sustainability score, simply add the relevant values for a comic and divide by three.

No comments:

Post a Comment